Comments on: Gay Marriage is Gay (and gay means happy)

By: WorldWideWhip

WorldWideWhip — Sun, 17 May 2009 08:46:15 +0000

Any religious definition attached to marriage was surrendered by religion when that term was written into the law. The state does not require any result of any marriage license or contract. No children need be raised, no real minimum time to stay married, no affiliation to any religion is required, not even cohabitation necessary. Any mention of children is utterly irrelevant in regards to civil law matters of marriage.
Marriage, in state matters, means that stuff/rights granted by the license

By: LoveNotTheWaysOfTheW

LoveNotTheWaysOfTheW — Sat, 27 Dec 2008 00:23:36 +0000

The first one I’ll put up is on homosexuality. Titled, satan is homosexuality. Oh religion does not start wars…men start wars. Wow. I have alot of work to do. lol

By: LoveNotTheWaysOfTheW

LoveNotTheWaysOfTheW — Sat, 27 Dec 2008 00:19:32 +0000

Dude we have all messed up in sin. To pratice divinity is a sin. I made a video on homosexuality and why it is not good. the god ooooon the dollar is not the God from the bible “Ra Osirus” or satan. This country was founded by occult members, free masons. Our Four Fathers. I will compare all of your statements with what the bible says and explain it in easy terms. By the way I follow the bible and I am not mad with what you said. I agree though, alot of christians suck

By: leftwingersareweak

leftwingersareweak — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:44:12 +0000

…that is in the government’s best interests to reward with special status as is traditional marriage.

And then there is the problem of turning our backs on the natural (and obvious) design of men and women to be in union physically, emotionally, spiritually, etc. that is clearly the way it was meant to be.

By: leftwingersareweak

leftwingersareweak — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:40:58 +0000

I agree that the most ideal situation is to be raised by a “happy” couple (male/female). Unfortunately, your parents allowed hatred to rule their lives instead of forgiveness…and you paid the price. Happens all too often in this world. This is a broken world, and we see divorce as the “solution” far too frequently. Problem is, we still carry forward our “issues” to the next relationship. Gay marriage should not get the same status by government because it is not the social arrangement…

By: leftwingersareweak

leftwingersareweak — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:35:53 +0000

Every man in the U.S. can marry a woman and every woman can marry a man. Thus, everyone has the same rights. This can’t be disputed. Gays want to have rights expanded just due to their sexual proclivities. I’m very surprised that after many years of life that you don’t recognize that males and females each provide a different and important perspective in how they view life. I’ve never heard anyone challenge that. The family structure has been dad, mom, and children for eons.

By: MetalTimesInfinity

MetalTimesInfinity — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:41:33 +0000

They do not have the same rights, first off. Look into the custody laws if one partner were to die. It’s very flimsy at best in unions.
Second, I do not agree that there’s anything “ideal” about a man and a woman. I don’t see two men or two women as being any different. You’re assuming I buy in to traditional gender roles, which I do not. I’m still doing very well for myself socially speaking and I’ve never had gender identity problems, despite being from a very complicated parental background.

By: MetalTimesInfinity

MetalTimesInfinity — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:37:32 +0000

Indeed, but I was using slang as an example. The main thing I’m trying to illustrate is that it adds another, equally valid definition to the equation. Let’s think of the word “Nut”. It was once only a legume, but now it can also refer to a perforated and threaded metal hexagon or a part on the neck of a guitar. Both are valid, exclusive definitions and don’t conceptually affect the others.

By: leftwingersareweak

leftwingersareweak — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:34:53 +0000

You absolutely are trying to radically change marriage and what it has been defined as for eons. Gays can hire an attorney to provide legal coverage for their “partner”…and no, the “special consideration” isn’t soley due to sexual preference. It is granted because government rightly recognizes that a male and a female working together as parents provide a unique and critical ideal social arrangement in which to raise children. Do you not agree with that?

PS Gays have the same rights.

By: leftwingersareweak

leftwingersareweak — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:29:50 +0000

Like you said, that is “slang” which is a completely different situation. Of course, people can use words that already exist for different purposes. If people started calling hip people…say…”lamps”, that doesn’t mean that the original definition of a lamp has changed. Make sense?